It’s this year’s Origami and years from surfacing.
I’m sorry, but I’m simply not going to get on the wow bandwagon. I’ve even had an IM debate with a friend already this morning.
The fact is that there really isn’t any NEW innovation in this, where NEW means “wow I had absolutely no idea this could be done today” or “this wasn’t available a year ago”.
I’m a Microsoft fanboy most of the time, but the answer to the following questions are all “no” so I’m just going to find myself bored and at the same time amused at all the hype that’s going to come out of this.
- Can I have one today?
- Does it cost the same as a computer + projector + sensors + table or even close?
- Can I get it the way I want it in terms of colour, size, form factor?
- Can I use my existing computer with it – like dock my tablet into the side and so just purchase the table/projector/sensor combo and install some software?
- Does it have an intuitive interface? Easy to learn yes; immediately intuitive, no – completely breaks UI standards with different apps having different drag semantics.
- Is this the first time Microsoft has shown this technology?
- Can I get one this time next year for the same price?
- Can I get the runtime and build my own?
- Is there an SDK?
- Does my credit card or other existing devices work with it directly?
- Is there a consumer-friendly kit for making my existing devices readable for placement on the surface?
- Can consumers get one at a reasonable price with three years?
Do I want one today as my coffee table? YES, if there’s an SDK.
I could play space invaders on a coin-op machine in a pub about two decades ago. Why did this take so long? Microsoft admits starting on this in 2001 – why did it take until now? If anyone is thinking “But… <insert whizzing technology> wasn’t available….”, stop right there and think if you are acting on blustering belief or considered application. Even on the 1990s space invader table, you could have had useful applications with that level of graphics. Considering Microsoft did Zune and Xbox so fast, and everyone up to Bill Gates authorised a team, what took so long?! I’m not saying it could have been done back then, though I could have justified US$10K at that point – more like 2000 perhaps. Actually, those paying attention know that Bill Gates has shown this kind of technology already, and it was a while ago, so why is everyone acting like bread could only be sliced today? Calm down!
Apparently these devices will cost $5K to $10K US and the END of 2007? Why?! Makes it sound awfully delicate to put one in a restaurant if it costs that much to replace. Does everything in the furniture market have to be so over-priced and unavailable?
Many people aren’t quite as fixated on technology stuff as some of us, so this all looks so cool, but it has been demo’d prominately by Bill Gates before. It feels overdone because it has been on the cards for such a long time and this announcement (mostly consisting of consumer experiences) carries zero promise of availability to consumers and an extremely low chance of a consumer getting to interact with one.
It’s not surprising that all the sophisticated demoes are for brands that have the money to invest in these things: casinos and telcos.
Everyone is so into this that they fail to notice that the demos are done by people that have been using it for a long time and have learnt the drag semantics. The demos are so far baked that they all have their differing ideas for what dragging does and how the UI goes. WPF can be used to break years of Windows UI consistency, and this new UI is a whole new UI that screaming excitement but hasn’t been given to anyone to really standardise or play with.
Oooo, Ahhhh, so when can even a developer get one at a reasonable price? Is news really that slow, and everyone really that bored that they think this is really that innovative?
“How can you say… or not be excited by…” – because I already asked myself the questions above, the first time I saw a Microsoft demo of the technology months ago. Everyone seems to be acting like a kid in a candy store, but they haven’t yet realised that all the candy is made of promotional cut outs, because someone hasn’t yet finished developing the candy and their pocket money wont be able to afford this kind of candy for quite some time.
If it’s that innovative, then why does it take companies with deep pockets to get it rolling and drive the price down?
So why has it been announced today? Well, I’d guess it’s probably because it has been incubated for 6 years, and it would almost be embarrasing not to announce something, especially after Bill demo’d it a while ago already, plus the reality that if some money isn’t made back on the work, it will just end up getting dropped or developed at a cheaper cost by a start-up or hobbyist somewhere (if there’s isn’t one already doing it?)
Of course, all hype (good or bad) adds to the discussion, so even if you don’t agree with anything I’ve said, it will create the opportunity for more people to talk about Microsoft Surface (which is currently 1000s of fathoms far from surfacing). I haven’t included a single link in here, because it’s all over the Web today and it certainly doesn’t need any help from me🙂